Benchmarks / All stores / v2.0.10

Agentic commerce benchmark across all stores v2.0.10

This is version v2.0.10, issued 16 October 2026. The current version is v4.0.0.

An AI shopping agent reached the payment step on 87% of the 317 stores Ottom measured at every stage in the 90 days to 16 October 2026, in every category and including stores whose category could not be determined, and the median agentic readiness score was 97 out of 100. Cite

This benchmark pools every store Ottom has scanned, across all categories, including stores whose category could not be determined. Each store is counted once, whichever category it is in. It is counted under exactly the rules each category is, set out in the methodology.

n = 317 measured of 346 scanned · 18 July 2026 to 16 October 2026 · v2.0.10 · bench-v5 · methodology

Scores come from the 317 stores Ottom measured at every stage. A further 29 were scanned but stopped before checkout, usually at bot protection or a robots.txt rule, so they have no comparable score. All 346 are still counted in the stalls below, because what was found on a store does not depend on how it was scored.

A store enters Ottom’s survey only if a catalogue of at least ten products can be read from it in one request, which in practice means Shopify and WooCommerce storefronts. These figures therefore describe the storefronts Ottom can read in bulk rather than online retail as a whole. The methodology sets out what that excludes.

Between 1 and 10 October 2026 the median score across all stores rose from 55 to 97. The stores did not change. Our agent did. On 4 October 2026 we replaced the scripted agent that walked checkout, agent-v1, with a new one, agent-v2, and from 8 October 2026 we measured every surveyed store again with it. On 250 stores measured by both, the old agent reached the payment step on 5 and the new one on 212. Figures before 10 October 2026 were measured wholly or partly by the old agent and are not compared with figures after it. The methodology sets out which agent measured these figures.

Reaching the payment step

87% of the 317 stores Ottom measured let an AI shopping agent reach the payment step. Ottom stops there and never submits payment. Cite

Each square is 1% of the 317 stores measured. Green: the agent reached the payment step.

Where agents stall

Of the 317 stores Ottom measured at every stage, 84% scored 80 or better at the discover stage, against 90% at the compare stage. Cite

Each stage of the journey, and the share of stores whose score at that stage was 80 or better.

Green: stores that scored 80 or better at the stage. The rest of each bar is stores that did not.
All stores agentic readiness by journey stage, 18 July 2026 to 16 October 2026
StageMedian scoreStores passingStores measured
Discover10084%317
Evaluate8887%317
Compare10090%317
Buy10087%317

What stops them

The most common stall across all stores is products have no GTIN or MPN to match against, found on 64% of the 346 stores Ottom scanned in the 90 days to 16 October 2026. Cite

The most common stalls across all stores, as a share of all 346 stores scanned. A stall found on fewer than 5 stores is withheld, because at that count it points at a merchant rather than at a pattern.

Each stall sits under the stage where it stops an agent. The bar is the share of stores it was found on.
Most common stalls for stores, 18 July 2026 to 16 October 2026
StallStageSeverityShare of stores
Products have no GTIN or MPN to match againstEvaluateEvaluateMedium64%
Variants are not described in structured dataEvaluateEvaluateHigh12%
Product pages have no schema.org markupDiscoverDiscoverHigh8%
No sitemap for agents to crawlDiscoverDiscoverHigh8%
Shipping cost cannot be determined before checkoutCompareCompareHigh8%
Add to cart needs JavaScript the agent cannot runBuyBuyMedium7%
No llms.txt to orient agentsDiscoverDiscoverLow4%
Agent could not reach the payment stepBuyBuyCritical2%
Feed price and storefront price disagreeCompareCompareHigh2%
Product pages did not answer when the agent asked for themDiscoverDiscoverHigh2%

What to change first

6 further stalls were found but withheld: too few stores showed them to report a share without pointing at an individual store.

Readiness score

The median of the 317 stores Ottom measured at every stage in the 90 days to 16 October 2026 scored 97 out of 100, and a quarter of them scored 93 or below. Cite

The spread of overall readiness scores across the category. We publish quartiles rather than a best and worst store, because the best and the worst are each one identifiable merchant.

93Lower quartile
97Median
97Upper quartile
Shaded: the middle half of stores. Dark line: the median store.

Most stores score near the top: three quarters score 93 or more, and the middle store scores 97. Reaching the payment step is worth 40 of the 100 points, and a store where the agent did not reach it can earn at most 18 of those 40. So the score separates the stores an agent can buy from from the stores it cannot, and does not separate stores within each group by much.

How to cite this benchmark

These figures are published under CC BY 4.0. Quote them, chart them and reuse them, commercial use included. Credit Ottom and link to this page, as below.

Suggested citation

Ottom, Agentic commerce benchmark across all stores v2.0.10, 18 July 2026 to 16 October 2026, methodology bench-v5. https://ottom.io/benchmarks/all. Licensed CC BY 4.0.

As HTML, for a web page

Source: Ottom, <a href="https://ottom.io/benchmarks/all">Agentic commerce benchmark across all stores v2.0.10</a>, 18 July 2026 to 16 October 2026, methodology bench-v5. Licensed under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" rel="license">CC BY 4.0</a>.

Cite one figure

Each figure has its own link, so a quote can point at the sentence it came from.

  • Summaryhttps://ottom.io/benchmarks/all/v2.0.10#summary
  • Reaching paymenthttps://ottom.io/benchmarks/all/v2.0.10#checkout
  • Stageshttps://ottom.io/benchmarks/all/v2.0.10#stages
  • Most common stallhttps://ottom.io/benchmarks/all/v2.0.10#stalls
  • Median scorehttps://ottom.io/benchmarks/all/v2.0.10#score

The citation names version v2.0.10, so the exact figures quoted can be checked later.

The same figures as JSON.